Sustainable change: FRC vs. PRI

This video is in response to a question I received from Barrett:

"So, people will buy into the idea that strength training, fitness in general and even FRC have long-term benefits. Meaning, if they are performed, results will come and the results will be sustainable. Basically, “real change” is being made in the body.

However, I am having a hard time convincing people that PRI has sustainable long-term benefits and can make “real change” in the body. Whether it be neutral rib posture or even the external/internal shoulder rotation.

Do you have an opinions or suggestions in this regard?

How have you been able to convince others that PRI is able to produce “real change” in the body similar to other means of training?"

I discuss:

  1. The distinction between neurophysiological change and structural tissue change
  2. Relationships in the body the effect body position vs. focusing on isolated structural change
  3. Commonalities between FRC and PRI

Please comment with any questions. Happy to discuss this further.